<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buying life insurance for your parents: Is it wise? Is it wrong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/</link>
	<description>Christian Personal Finance - Financial help blog, debt help and other financial resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:22:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skipper</title>
		<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-57136</link>
		<dc:creator>Skipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianpf.com/?p=4139#comment-57136</guid>
		<description>This is a simple IRR calculation.  What kind of return can you get by purchasing the insurance, and how does it measure up to the return you could currently get in the investment marketplace?  The lapse protection guarantee UL policies are a great for this purpose.  If the kids are worried about one of them not being able to afford it down the line, each child could purchase their own policy and be responsible for their own funding.  This typicall works best with insureds who are a little older (70 or so), but run the numbers, look at the IRR (provided on most illustrations) and see where you&#039;re at.

I wouldn&#039;t worry a lot about long term care insurance.  There is a definite &quot;sweet spot&quot; for this type of sale (too many assets not to protect, but not enough to self-insure), and it sounds like your mother doesn&#039;t fall into this category.  She is low income, and I&#039;m making the assumption - correct me if I&#039;m wrong - that she is also &quot;low asset&quot;.  If that&#039;s the case, the nursing home will take what she has, and she will then qualify for Medicaid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a simple IRR calculation.  What kind of return can you get by purchasing the insurance, and how does it measure up to the return you could currently get in the investment marketplace?  The lapse protection guarantee UL policies are a great for this purpose.  If the kids are worried about one of them not being able to afford it down the line, each child could purchase their own policy and be responsible for their own funding.  This typicall works best with insureds who are a little older (70 or so), but run the numbers, look at the IRR (provided on most illustrations) and see where you&#8217;re at.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t worry a lot about long term care insurance.  There is a definite &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; for this type of sale (too many assets not to protect, but not enough to self-insure), and it sounds like your mother doesn&#8217;t fall into this category.  She is low income, and I&#8217;m making the assumption &#8211; correct me if I&#8217;m wrong &#8211; that she is also &#8220;low asset&#8221;.  If that&#8217;s the case, the nursing home will take what she has, and she will then qualify for Medicaid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolution Of Wealth</title>
		<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-46062</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolution Of Wealth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianpf.com/?p=4139#comment-46062</guid>
		<description>Okay...before I wrote the first comment, what I should have said was, how could you ever consider this with term insurance?  This strategy can not be done with term insurance that would just be plain stupid.  When I say guarantee I&#039;m talking about a properly designed permanent life insurance policy.  Term insurance should be completely removed from this conversation/strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay&#8230;before I wrote the first comment, what I should have said was, how could you ever consider this with term insurance?  This strategy can not be done with term insurance that would just be plain stupid.  When I say guarantee I&#8217;m talking about a properly designed permanent life insurance policy.  Term insurance should be completely removed from this conversation/strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-46040</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianpf.com/?p=4139#comment-46040</guid>
		<description>@Evolution of Wealth:

I think you&#039;re contradicting yourself a bit there.  You say there&#039;s a good chance a 65 year old will make it to 90, but then go on to say that it&#039;s guaranteed that the policy will be paid.  Remember that a policy only gets paid if the person dies while the policy is in place.  So if you&#039;re saying they get a 25 year policy and there&#039;s a good chance she lives to 90, what about 91.  

If she lives to 91 then by that time the policy has expired, and when it expires it is worth nothing.  So you aren&#039;t guaranteed money remember, it&#039;s all or nothing.  In my opinion it&#039;s a bigger risk than the 401(k), because of that.  And of course if someone is sick and you think &quot;well of course she&#039;ll die before then&quot; the insurance company knows that as well and your rate will be very high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Evolution of Wealth:</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re contradicting yourself a bit there.  You say there&#8217;s a good chance a 65 year old will make it to 90, but then go on to say that it&#8217;s guaranteed that the policy will be paid.  Remember that a policy only gets paid if the person dies while the policy is in place.  So if you&#8217;re saying they get a 25 year policy and there&#8217;s a good chance she lives to 90, what about 91.  </p>
<p>If she lives to 91 then by that time the policy has expired, and when it expires it is worth nothing.  So you aren&#8217;t guaranteed money remember, it&#8217;s all or nothing.  In my opinion it&#8217;s a bigger risk than the 401(k), because of that.  And of course if someone is sick and you think &#8220;well of course she&#8217;ll die before then&#8221; the insurance company knows that as well and your rate will be very high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolution Of Wealth</title>
		<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-45953</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolution Of Wealth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 04:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianpf.com/?p=4139#comment-45953</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m jumping in late as a bit of a devil&#039;s advocate.

Let&#039;s assume parents have kids at 30 just because it&#039;s easy and a round number.  Then I would assume that in today&#039;s world there&#039;s a really good chance that a 65 year old could make it to 90.  If she&#039;s 65 then it&#039;s 25 years.

Now, you have an investment opportunity.  It is a guaranteed sum of money to be paid out to you in 25 years.  You are going to contribute to it consistently on a monthly basis much like your 401k.  Except this money will not be subject to market fluctuations.  In face, you can&#039;t loose money.  You will give up some gains in order to get this benefit.  You also will be able to get this money completely tax free.  No rules, stipulations or taxes on this money.  I would prefer that over a 401k, wouldn&#039;t you?

When set up properly this account start off high and grow gradually.  If things go bad you&#039;ll have access to the monies but if you don&#039;t access it you will be able to enjoy the benefits above.  Regardless of what this account is would you do it financially?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m jumping in late as a bit of a devil&#8217;s advocate.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume parents have kids at 30 just because it&#8217;s easy and a round number.  Then I would assume that in today&#8217;s world there&#8217;s a really good chance that a 65 year old could make it to 90.  If she&#8217;s 65 then it&#8217;s 25 years.</p>
<p>Now, you have an investment opportunity.  It is a guaranteed sum of money to be paid out to you in 25 years.  You are going to contribute to it consistently on a monthly basis much like your 401k.  Except this money will not be subject to market fluctuations.  In face, you can&#8217;t loose money.  You will give up some gains in order to get this benefit.  You also will be able to get this money completely tax free.  No rules, stipulations or taxes on this money.  I would prefer that over a 401k, wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>When set up properly this account start off high and grow gradually.  If things go bad you&#8217;ll have access to the monies but if you don&#8217;t access it you will be able to enjoy the benefits above.  Regardless of what this account is would you do it financially?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roman</title>
		<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-18063</link>
		<dc:creator>roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianpf.com/?p=4139#comment-18063</guid>
		<description>Bob thank you for being responsive to your readers!!!

To all contributors, thank you for your sound advice.  God bless you all and keep making good financial decisions based on our Lord&#039;s principles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob thank you for being responsive to your readers!!!</p>
<p>To all contributors, thank you for your sound advice.  God bless you all and keep making good financial decisions based on our Lord&#8217;s principles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GHolmes</title>
		<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-18018</link>
		<dc:creator>GHolmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianpf.com/?p=4139#comment-18018</guid>
		<description>This whole topic makes me shudder.  The kids that went to their mother to suggest this should be slapped.  Good cotton picking grief.  That would be a great holiday meal,&quot; Hey Mom how you feeling today?&quot;  &quot;Hope you die in 20 years so we can all sit on our lazy butts and then make money.&quot;  I am appalled we are even talking about this.  Come ON!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole topic makes me shudder.  The kids that went to their mother to suggest this should be slapped.  Good cotton picking grief.  That would be a great holiday meal,&#8221; Hey Mom how you feeling today?&#8221;  &#8220;Hope you die in 20 years so we can all sit on our lazy butts and then make money.&#8221;  I am appalled we are even talking about this.  Come ON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Holmes</title>
		<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-18017</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianpf.com/?p=4139#comment-18017</guid>
		<description>I personally think they should go with the policy. I know when I pass I would want my kids taken. And in case I don&#039;t have the assets to do that life insurance is a great substitute.

Just my thoughts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think they should go with the policy. I know when I pass I would want my kids taken. And in case I don&#8217;t have the assets to do that life insurance is a great substitute.</p>
<p>Just my thoughts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-18015</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianpf.com/?p=4139#comment-18015</guid>
		<description>Assuming that we&#039;re only talking about taking out an insurance policy for the reason of the children getting money when your mother dies, and that if this money wasn&#039;t spent on this insurance policy it would be kept by the children and spent on something for themselves/their own family....

I did some math.  I went to Zander Insurance (zanderins.com) and found what it would cost to get a 20 year policy for a 65 year old woman.  For 100k worth of coverage it would cost 1535 a year, I assumed there were three of you (just a guess) so I called it 500 per child per year, with each child receiving roughly 33k on your mother&#039;s death.  

Then I went to Dave Ramsey&#039;s website and used a financial calculator to see what 500/year invested at 10% would be, and in 20 years it would actually be about 33k.  So financially it breaks down to a point where if she lives less than 20 years you make out better with the life insurance, if she lives close to 20 years you about break even that way, but if she lives even a day past the policy you end up with nothing.  

So with that being said I wouldn&#039;t do it.  First off I never want to be in a position to say &quot;if mom doesn&#039;t die this year I&#039;m out 10k&quot;, that&#039;s creepy.  If I&#039;m making an investment I&#039;d like it to be an investment, not a gamble on someone&#039;s life.  If you just invest the money you guarantee there will be something there.  Also, you made it sound like she&#039;s going to be throwing money into this herself, again if she wants to leave money to the family she would be better off just investing it.  I think you should do what others have said and get her long term care insurance, so the money she currently has does not wind up going to pay for her long term care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming that we&#8217;re only talking about taking out an insurance policy for the reason of the children getting money when your mother dies, and that if this money wasn&#8217;t spent on this insurance policy it would be kept by the children and spent on something for themselves/their own family&#8230;.</p>
<p>I did some math.  I went to Zander Insurance (zanderins.com) and found what it would cost to get a 20 year policy for a 65 year old woman.  For 100k worth of coverage it would cost 1535 a year, I assumed there were three of you (just a guess) so I called it 500 per child per year, with each child receiving roughly 33k on your mother&#8217;s death.  </p>
<p>Then I went to Dave Ramsey&#8217;s website and used a financial calculator to see what 500/year invested at 10% would be, and in 20 years it would actually be about 33k.  So financially it breaks down to a point where if she lives less than 20 years you make out better with the life insurance, if she lives close to 20 years you about break even that way, but if she lives even a day past the policy you end up with nothing.  </p>
<p>So with that being said I wouldn&#8217;t do it.  First off I never want to be in a position to say &#8220;if mom doesn&#8217;t die this year I&#8217;m out 10k&#8221;, that&#8217;s creepy.  If I&#8217;m making an investment I&#8217;d like it to be an investment, not a gamble on someone&#8217;s life.  If you just invest the money you guarantee there will be something there.  Also, you made it sound like she&#8217;s going to be throwing money into this herself, again if she wants to leave money to the family she would be better off just investing it.  I think you should do what others have said and get her long term care insurance, so the money she currently has does not wind up going to pay for her long term care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn</title>
		<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-18002</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianpf.com/?p=4139#comment-18002</guid>
		<description>We all know that each of us WILL die eventually so the question really states, &quot;...WHEN she passes, a sum of money could be left for her kids and grandkids.&quot;....&quot; It sounds like a scheme to quickly increase their own personal wealth. 
If the children are in a financial situation where they need the money...they won&#039;t be able to pay for the premiums anyway. 
If they are able to afford the premiums, why not put that money into their own savings account for their own future use. 

I agree with DARREN about the purpose of life insurance. That is to protect a persons dependents from financial difficulties when they die. It doesn&#039;t sound to me like any of the children in this case are dependent upon their Mother. She would only need enough insurance coverage to cover any costs associated with her death. These costs could be anywhere from $10,000-$30,000 depending on circumstances (or more). 

Instead, why not pay for those post-death expenses now. Many funeral homes have pre-paid packages with monthly payments. While it sounds morbid, think of the advantages. It allows the &quot;dying&quot; person to make their own decisions about their post-death care. Whether they want to be cremated or buried, which coffin they want, which burial plot they want, etc. Knowing that their loved one got the exact care they wanted is a wonderful gift to give your grieving family during a very stressful time. 

If that is to emotionally difficult to do at the time, such decisions should still be talked about so that the persons wishes are known. Then another helpful route to take is long term care insurance. But that could end up to be a waste of money if the person died before needing the long term care. 

Anything other than that is predatory and morally wrong. 
I hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that each of us WILL die eventually so the question really states, &#8220;&#8230;WHEN she passes, a sum of money could be left for her kids and grandkids.&#8221;&#8230;.&#8221; It sounds like a scheme to quickly increase their own personal wealth.<br />
If the children are in a financial situation where they need the money&#8230;they won&#8217;t be able to pay for the premiums anyway.<br />
If they are able to afford the premiums, why not put that money into their own savings account for their own future use. </p>
<p>I agree with DARREN about the purpose of life insurance. That is to protect a persons dependents from financial difficulties when they die. It doesn&#8217;t sound to me like any of the children in this case are dependent upon their Mother. She would only need enough insurance coverage to cover any costs associated with her death. These costs could be anywhere from $10,000-$30,000 depending on circumstances (or more). </p>
<p>Instead, why not pay for those post-death expenses now. Many funeral homes have pre-paid packages with monthly payments. While it sounds morbid, think of the advantages. It allows the &#8220;dying&#8221; person to make their own decisions about their post-death care. Whether they want to be cremated or buried, which coffin they want, which burial plot they want, etc. Knowing that their loved one got the exact care they wanted is a wonderful gift to give your grieving family during a very stressful time. </p>
<p>If that is to emotionally difficult to do at the time, such decisions should still be talked about so that the persons wishes are known. Then another helpful route to take is long term care insurance. But that could end up to be a waste of money if the person died before needing the long term care. </p>
<p>Anything other than that is predatory and morally wrong.<br />
I hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://christianpf.com/buying-life-insurance-for-your-parents/comment-page-1/#comment-17999</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianpf.com/?p=4139#comment-17999</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the mom in this situation would be better served by a long-term care insurance policy than a life insurance policy.  LTC costs average $6000-$8000/mo nowadays, so a policy to help cover such costs would help the mother as well as the children (unless they don&#039;t mind having her in a facility that takes Medicaid).  Or, they could just put the money in a high-yield savings account to cover unforseen medical expenses.  Wouldn&#039;t give the same amount of leverage, though.  At this mom&#039;s age, life insurance would mainly be used for tax-free wealth transfer or to cover future estate taxes.  Given that she was described as &quot;low income&quot;, though, it doesn&#039;t sound like she has a need for either.  In which case, having the children contribute to a life insurance policy would be morally suspect, since they&#039;re just leveraging their money to get a higher payout upon their mother&#039;s death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the mom in this situation would be better served by a long-term care insurance policy than a life insurance policy.  LTC costs average $6000-$8000/mo nowadays, so a policy to help cover such costs would help the mother as well as the children (unless they don&#8217;t mind having her in a facility that takes Medicaid).  Or, they could just put the money in a high-yield savings account to cover unforseen medical expenses.  Wouldn&#8217;t give the same amount of leverage, though.  At this mom&#8217;s age, life insurance would mainly be used for tax-free wealth transfer or to cover future estate taxes.  Given that she was described as &#8220;low income&#8221;, though, it doesn&#8217;t sound like she has a need for either.  In which case, having the children contribute to a life insurance policy would be morally suspect, since they&#8217;re just leveraging their money to get a higher payout upon their mother&#8217;s death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

